data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e93/25e93b0d625dae36911be7e60ac57a79bbb33350" alt="Ia writer web"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18b8c/18b8c49cb8766bcbb088d46da0481ad64412e2fb" alt="ia writer web ia writer web"
Moreover, while I’m now more comfortable using a rich text based application like Scrivener, I still value the portability and future proofing of plain text files. Scrivener is working and syncing flawlessly. Scrivener tech support pointed out my error. I also discovered that it was user error and not Scrivener that caused the syncing problem I mentioned in this post. Having resolved this matter in my mind, I quickly concluded that Scrivener for large projects like books is superior to other options. I never questioned this before joining this forum but I got swept up on the plain text bandwagon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcfe3/fcfe3523c600d9ad211d5cbc8bf56024f022f55a" alt="ia writer web ia writer web"
I’ve come to realize that it is “ok” to use rich text based applications. I’ve tried everything and I believe I’ve found the right combination of apps that do what I need while keeping subscriptions to a minimum.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/842d6/842d639121a50b49a10159e150908d4ee1ffcabe" alt="ia writer web ia writer web"
But, I’m working on breaking what in excess is an unproductive habit. My only consolation is that I’m not the only one in this forum “guilty” of switching and trying apps too often.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e93/25e93b0d625dae36911be7e60ac57a79bbb33350" alt="Ia writer web"